THE HANGOVER: PART II - REVIEW


Comedy sequels are a hard one. If any comedy shows any sign of popularity you can bet that an inferior sequel is just around the corner ready to rack up the cash once more. Usually three things can happen:

1/ They get it right in that they expand on the story/characters, bring something new to the table and still create something fun and original (Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, American Pie 2, Austin Powers 2, Wayne's World 2...)

2/ They get it almost right, in other words the filmmakers didn't quite get what people liked about the first film so they did pretty much the same thing but with slight differences or a different setting. Usually that doesn't quite work but makes the sequel feel fresh enough that fans of the original film can still enjoy it (Ace Ventura 2, Ghostbusters 2...)

3/ They get it wrong...(Splash Too)

Hangover II falls under the second category: more of the same but oddly considerably darker and...in Thailand.

This time Stu (Ed Helms) loses his fiancee's little brother in Bangkok and the gang once again are on a desperate quest to put the pieces of their brains back together to find the kid before his big wedding.
The reviews haven't exactly been glowing for this one even if it did deliver at the box-office but althought the complaints are usually valid this is still a fun film. Now I'm not sure if the new setting works in the film's favour as Bangkok seems to bring out the worst in our familiar characters. Zach Galifiniakis' weirdo Alan starts off glorious then is strangely reduced to a wimpering child wandering silently in the background, Stu screams throughout, Phil (Bradley Cooper) stereotypes like hell and Ken Jeong is more horrendous a creation than ever.

On top of that some of Todd Phillips' darker humour comes off as more disturbing than funny in a lot of places. Paul Giamatti's cameo is just plain intimidating, the guys get shot, cheat with gender-bending prostitutes, dump dead bodies in ice boxes, get their fingers cut off... If it weren't for Alan this would be one unpleasant thriller! Then again if smoking monkeys and tiny penises sound appealing to you then you're in for a treat!

As it stands though there are admittedly a lot of funny bits here and there which do keep you watching and in the end it's a fun ride, you just have to be ready for it. A clever little ending twist and some smart plot-points do elevate it above the original film from a detective-style movie standpoint at least.

Overall, fans of the original will find loads to enjoy but will no doubt complain about the copy/paste premise, others will probably go either way. It's not the first one but it works just about well enough to give you a fun night out at the movies, that is if you have a slightly twisted sense of humour to begin with.

Curious to see what they do with Part III...I'm actually scared for these guys' safety now...

I only hope they leave Mike Tyson and his "singing" alone this time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

STAR TREK: FIRST CONTACT - REVIEW

Image
Finally free from the clutches of the iconic Original Series , Picard and co. finally got their own movie to play with and delivered this much better, much darker, much less gimmicky outing. This time, we're introduced to the Borgs, a race of soulless, zombie-like drones capable of assimilating people completely. A popular race of bad guys in the series, their Hellraiser -style S&M look certainly begged for a movie! First Contact opens with Picard having a nightmare about the time he almost became a Borg forever and little by little, as the current Borg threat increases, he starts to crack up, feeling a responsibility to sort that problem out himself as he still has a slight connection to them but also wanting a kind of revenge, closure if you will, for what they did to him the first time around. The plot sees the crew of the Enterprise witness the Earth get completely assimilated by the Borgs so they go back in time before Earth made its "first contact" with al
Read more

24: SEASON 1 - REVIEW

Image
I know, I'm like 100 years late. But I'm The "Retro" Critic! :P I remember catching a glimpse of this iconic show back in the day and actually finding it pretty entertaining. Sadly, I hadn't followed the thread from the very beginning so it felt like catching the season about halfway through would be a bit of a waste. I decided to wait until I could check it out on DVD. 10 years later... Well I finally made it, that's the main thing, right? So was it worth the wait? What do I make of this very first season? It's good. I thought it would be quite good and it was. Basically I'm rarely taken by a cop-themed series unless you've got a mad scientist in there ( Fringe ), evil twins ( Alias ) or... Columbo ( Columbo ). But 24 did a hell of a good job keeping me entertained throughout and making me care about MOST of what was going on. Kiefer Sutherland's Jack Bauer is a hard one to dislike and is pretty much the glue holding the whole sho
Read more

THE ADDAMS FAMILY MUSICAL - REVIEW

Image
 Looks like every Broadway comedy musical these days is trying to be The Producers ... Mel Brooks' hugely successful show now being the basic template for shows based on movies (with the exception of the admittedly *ahem* unique Spiderman musical), after Dirty Rotten Scoundrels we're treated to Broadway's The Addams Family. An odd release but probably an inevitable one. Not based on any of the movies, the story actually follows up from past adaptations and sees a now grown-up Wednesday falling in love with a "normal" dude and having to face her unconventional family. It's essentially Addams Family Values with Wednesday taking on the Fester role. A good idea which should please both fans of the films and those looking to see something new. But what works for The Producers just doesn't work for everything. Nathan Lane as Gomez Addams? So much for the tall, suave, maniacal Gomez we all know and love! Don't get me wrong, I love Nathan Lane but list
Read more